The problem

Without Olli, Claude’s giving your competitors the same answer.

Ask Claude a question about a deal, and you’ll get the same generic output as everyone else with access to the exact same model. Olli’s the one way to ensure your reps get a fundamentally different answer:

What MCP does

Olli guides Claude with your data.

The Olli MCP is your bridge: Olli pushes your data, closed-won patterns, and playbook into Claude to guide its outputs. Making sure deal analysis finds the actual risk, and the next-move suggestions replicate what’s actually working.

Where it shows up

Skills. Artifacts. Chats.

Build Olli into Skills to make sure the latest pipeline-wide learnings are built in. So Claude does the work, with the right context and guidance.

Same pattern in Artifacts: Building a one-pager for a champion? Olli supplies the deal context, the buyer profile, and the play that worked last time. Claude renders it.

Why it matters

Highly-specific outputs, with tenured-rep quality.

Most reps already use Claude or ChatGPT for parts of their day. Without Olli, every output is generic. With Olli, every output is tuned to your motion, your data, and what your top performers do.

The tools your team already loves, doing the work the way your team actually wins.

Capabilities

Claude writes. Olli supplies the judgment.

Every prompt gets enriched with your deal history, buyer context, and closed-won patterns before the LLM generates a single word.

Same feature set in ChatGPT and Gemini via MCP

Memory across chats per deal, per account, per rep

Cross-account pattern matching surfaced inline

Artifacts that pull from your CRM, calls, and closed-won

Skills for pre-call briefs, follow-ups, executive briefs, business cases

Deal context pushed automatically to any chat with a deal name

Compare

Fluint vs the competition

Compare Fluint to stuff that sounds good, but doesn't win upmarket

Revenue Intelligence
(Gong, Clari, Sybill)
Deal Rooms
(Dock, Accord, Attention)
Generic LLMs
(ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)
Built for:
Call analysis
Buyer collaboration
General-purpose content
Pipeline forecasting
Post-demo resource hubs
Writing + summarizing
Manager coaching
Shared plans
Manual context setup
What It Replaces:
Call notes
Shared folders
Email drafts
Coaching docs
Static plans
Summary docs
Forecast spreadsheets
Buyer onboarding templates
One-off research
Who It Helps:
Sales managers
AEs & buyers
Marketers and ops
RevOps (some rep benefit)
CSM for post-sale
Not built for GTM execution
Enablement teams
Content creators
Why It Wins:
Strong visibility
Looks buyer-friendly
Flexible, but disconnected
Good for coaching
But rigid & generic
Requires constant prompting
Delayed impact
Doesn’t evolve with the deal
Not sales-native
Reactive not proactive
AI-Native:
Retrofitted AI layered on top of call data and dashboards
Light AI used for writing or task suggestions
AI-first but not sales-aware
Not deeply integrated
Lacks pipeline visibility or sales training

Got questions? We got you.

Scan some quick answers here, or book a time to chat 1:1

Do I need a Claude or ChatGPT enterprise plan?

Recommended for teams. Personal Claude/ChatGPT works for individual reps trying it out. Enterprise plans give you admin controls, audit logs, and policy enforcement that match what RevOps needs.

Is my data leaving my environment?

No. Olli pushes context to Claude as part of the chat session, scoped to the user. The data isn't training Claude's model. Same security model as your existing Claude or ChatGPT enterprise plan.

Does this work in ChatGPT and Gemini?

Yes. Same feature set across all three. MCP is the connector layer.

What is MCP?

Model Context Protocol. The standard for letting AI tools share structured context with each other. Olli uses MCP to push your data and patterns into Claude (and ChatGPT, Gemini) so generic LLMs behave like Olli on your motion.

Still have questions?

Let's dig into your use case live. We'll make sure you leave with clear answers:

Olli AI Sales Agent

Make your favorite tool smarter.

Connect Olli to Claude. Try it on your next deal question.