Most teams don’t sell with business cases. (And most of their reps miss their #.)

Yep, you can go ahead and get started with your own account.

There's no admin-level setup required (you can copy and paste in call transcripts without any integrations, or use a Fluint notetaker).

Plus, your commission from a single closed deal will more than pay for your whole year’s subscription.

You can build your first business case in 5 minutes. Here’s the process:

1. Create a workspace for your first deal. Upload notes and/or call transcripts.

2. Pick a framework from the Fluint library. Then click “generate.”

3. Fluint writes your first draft in 30 seconds, using your buyer’s own words.

4. We’ll analyze any discovery gaps and make suggestions.

5. Share your workspace with your champions for feedback & build together.

There you go.

We pay back 2X what you spent on any seller's license who used, but didn't directly close a deal in Fluint. It's our Revenue Guarantee.

(And yeah, we’re serious.)

You can save templated content inside Fluint, for sure.

But you'll also want to go beyond templates, to creating new content with champions, specific to their account.

‍That’s the IKEA effect at work. And it makes sure your champions actually want to use your content to sell internally (where it matters most).

Fluint scales up a “lightweight” version of your process, to every single deal in the pipeline. While Value Engineers focus on a smaller number of high-priority deals.

(1) Sellers start the business case process in Stage 1 vs. waiting until later.

(2) Fluint also focuses on the strategic narrative, to complement the numbers.

If a Value Engineer starts an in-depth value model later in the deal, they’ll already have an executive audience, plus all the "inputs" pre-structured.

Consolidation is good. But only if your tech stack already closed the single, biggest gap in every sales process:

Guiding the internal buying conversations sales reps aren’t part of.  

Which is where 90% of B2B buying happens. Yet, most tech stacks only focus on sales reps in sales meetings.

Which means even after consolidating tech spend, you’d focus all that reduced spend on just a fraction of where deals are won or lost.

No, if you use Gong, Chorus, or another tool, you’ll keep it in place. These tools coach your pitch during sales conversations.

Fluint creates content to guide your buyer’s internal meetings. They’re different use cases.

We just use the call transcript from these systems as a data source

Most teams do start here. Then they realize ChatGPT and CoPilot aren’t ideal.

The biggest reason is sellers don't stick with it. All the copying over inputs for each deal, hitting data limits, then getting output that's not sales-specific and ready to use is frustrating.

Which means there's no consistent execution inside deals.

For example: What percent of your sellers have used ChatGPT before? Likely a lot of them.

What percent of your deals have a business case? Likely very little of them.

Nope, Fluint is framework "agnostic."

You can load any methodology into Fluint (MEDDICC, SPICED, take your pick) to help reps execute on it consistently, across all deals.

Which also creates "evidence" of whether they’re using it, or not.

‍The process Fluint enables is also higher-level than a particular framework — it's a way of selling with the buyer at each step, to help them sell internally.

Fluint isn't a quick "workflow hack." It's about shifting the way sellers go to market, where the sales process is building the business case.

Every step of the way: from discovery, to running demos, etc.

It takes focus for each rep to make this shift. So when they know their leadership is fully committed, and their peers around the company are doing the same, it drives outcomes.

So you’re welcome to do a pilot.

But we see faster adoption from cohorts of reps without pilots first, because there’s strong commitment.